Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Review for the Sociology of Sport
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Segrave, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

THE (NEO)MODERN OLYMPIC GAMES

The Revolutions in Europe and the Resurgence of Universalism

Jeffrey O. Segrave

Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA

The purpose of this article is to consider the development of the Olympic Games throughout the 20th century in light of the evolving social and political realities that have shaped the Games and at the same time employ various currents of social theorizing to help us understand the unfolding of the Olympic story in instructive ways. First, the Games are characterized as they were conceived in the late 19th century as a classic expression of modernity. Second, I argue that the breakdown of the modernist project over the course of the 20th century has transformed the Games into a postmodern phenomenon, a development that has nurtured the Games but denigrated Olympism. Finally, I suggest that a more complete realization of the Olympic project may be imminent under the auspices of a newly emergent neomodernity. While the first two characterizations are more conventional, the third is more controversial, one that requires us to acknowledge the emergence of a new era precipitated by the profound occurrences of 1989, the revolutions in central and eastern Europe that have given a renewed vitality to the classic institutions of modernity and lent credibility to universalist projects like the Olympic Games.

Key Words: modern • neomodern • Olympics • postmodern

International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Vol. 35, No. 3, 268-281 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/101269000035003002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?