Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Review for the Sociology of Sport
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knoppers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elling, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘We Do Not Engage in Promotional Journalism’

Discursive Strategies Used by Sport Journalists to Describe the Selection Process

Annelies Knoppers

University of Utrecht, The Netherlands

Agnes Elling

Tilburg University and W.J.H. Mulier Instituut, The Netherlands

Although the results of content analyses of television and newspaper sport coverage have shown quantitative and qualitative gender differences, such analyses do not reveal why some texts are selected and others not. Although this selection process is constrained by structural factors, there is room for agency since journalists decide what to include and how to write about that. Little scholarly attention has been paid to the ways in which agency is used in the discourses of sport journalists to describe the gendering of the selection process. The purpose of this study is to explore the discursive strategies and their gendered subtexts employed by Dutch sports journalists in explaining the selection process, especially the exclusion of women’s sports coverage. The results show that the journalists conceal issues of gendered dynamics of power by using an ideology of neutrality. This strategy allows them to be misogynist and resistant to the coverage of women’s sport while simultaneously allowing them to claim neutrality and fairness for themselves. We explore how their discourse is linked to a broader societal discourse and how it simultaneously strengthens that discourse.

Key Words: gender • objectivity • sport journalism

International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Vol. 39, No. 1, 57-73 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1012690204040523


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Review for the Sociology of SportHome page
S. MacKay and C. Dallaire
Campus Newspaper Coverage of Varsity Sports: Getting Closer to Equitable and Sports-related Representations of Female Athletes?
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, March 1, 2009; 44(1): 25 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sport and Social IssuesHome page
R. Chappell
Sport in Postcolonial Uganda
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, May 1, 2008; 32(2): 177 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
S. Pan and C. Ryan
Gender, Framing, and Travelogues
Journal of Travel Research, May 1, 2007; 45(4): 464 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review for the Sociology of SportHome page
J. van Sterkenburg and A. Knoppers
Dominant Discourses about Race/Ethnicity and Gender in Sport Practice and Performance
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, September 1, 2004; 39(3): 301 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]